06 Jun, 2018
National Geographic has published a new report by CORAL Senior Editor Ret Talbot taking a look at cyanide use in collecting marine aquarium fishes and the concerns now being raised about the highly-praised cyanide testing protocol, first published by researchers at the University of Aveiro, Portugal, in 2012. This methodology was, until recently, widely touted as a possible solution to the ongoing problem of detecting cyanide exposure among coral reef fishes collected and exported into the worldwide aquarium trade.
However, after several years of investigation and trying to validate the test
in sea urchins, the skeleton, which consists mainly of calcium carbonate. The test is covered with a thin epidermis.” class=”glossaryLink”>test, a scientific team led by Dr. Andrew Rhyne found themselves surprised, stumped, and left questioning everything. When the fundamental biochemical math was reexamined, researchers realized that the entire premise may be flawed. The latest findings out of Roger Williams University (RWU) refute the validity of the lauded cyanide test and undermine all subsequent data that was produced utilizing the methodology.
This new National Geographic publication expands on what was initially released by RWU, and is the latest installment in this developing story.
As author Ret Talbot reports, “Rhyne, Breen, and colleagues found that the amount of cyanide necessary to produce the levels of thiocyanate reported in the 2012 paper would have to be so high that it would kill almost any animal on Earth. Their findings were published on May 30, 2018, in the journal PLoS ONE.”
Moreover, Talbot discussed the latest findings with Dr. Ricardo Calado, one of the authors on the original 2012 paper, and Miyoko Sakashita, Oceans Director and Senior Counsel the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), which utilized research findings based on the Portuguese cyanide test to condemn the aquarium trade—findings that may now have to be retracted, raising questions about how the data were obtained in the first place.
CBD reacts somewhat diplomatically to the new contradictory findings. Calado, Talbot reports, continues to defend the original work. Both Calado and Dr. Rhyne (an author of the latest RWU findings) go on the record saying there is more to come. What’s next?
To read more, see Ret Talbot’s article on National Geographic’s website: “Holy Grail” Test for Illegal Cyanide-Caught Aquarium Fish May Be Fatally Flawed.
Reef to Rainforest: Whistleblowers Debunk Once-Promising Cyanide Test for Aquarium Fish, May 31, 2018
Breen NE, Lowenstein J, Metivier R, Andrade L, Rhyne AL (2018) Can excreted thiocyanate be used to detect cyanide exposure in live reef fish? PLoS ONE 13(5): e0196841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196841
Vaz MCM, Rocha-Santos TAP, Rocha RJM, Lopes I, Pereira R, Duarte AC, et al. (2012) Excreted Thiocyanate Detects Live Reef Fishes Illegally Collected Using Cyanide—A Non-Invasive and Non-Destructive Testing Approach. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035355